The U.S. Trademark Office issued the following 161 trademark registrations to persons and businesses in Indiana in September 2021 based on applications filed by Indiana trademark attorneys:
| Reg. Number | Trademark |
| 6504403 | SUCCESS AT WORK COACH |
| 6500515 | TRUCKING FROM SCRATCH |
| 6500137 | GLENRIDGE |
| 6500132 | COASTAL MIX |
| 6500116 | EZ-REACH |
The U.S. Trademark Office issued the following 161 trademark registrations to persons and businesses in Indiana in August 2021 based on applications filed by Indiana trademark attorneys:
| Reg. Number | Word Mark |
| 6463659 | DEMON SEER |
| 6463658 | IMMORTAL SUPERS |
| 6463610 | Z5 |
| 6463004 | PALIBRIO |
| 6462139 | SWIMSUITS FOR ALL |
The U.S. Trademark Office issued the following 161 trademark registrations to persons and businesses in Indiana in July 2021 based on applications filed by Indiana trademark attorneys:
| Reg. Number | Word Mark |
| 6434626 | ZOOMERS RV |
| 6433404 | GEOTHERMAL ENERGY WE CAN ALL AGREE ON |
| 6432951 | RAYBELLA |
| 6432531 | HT HOBBS TELECOM |
| 6432457 | E3 |
The U.S. Trademark Office issued the following 170 trademark registrations to persons and businesses in Indiana in June 2021 based on applications filed by Indiana tradmark attorneys:
| Reg Number | Word Mark |
| 6385278 | JESUS GIRL |
| 6402371 | FOR FOX SAKE OFFROAD |
| 6402148 | LET’S NOT MEET BY ACCIDENT! |
| 6402123 | SAFEMINISTRY SOLUTIONS A SAFE HIRING SOLUTIONS COMPANY |
| 6402120 | SAFEMINISTRY SOLUTIONS |
The U.S. Trademark Office issued the following 187 trademark registrations to persons and businesses in Indiana in May 2021 based on applications filed by Indiana trademark attorneys:
| Reg. Number | Word Mark | |
| 6363617 | BADDIE IN HER BAG | |
| 6362805 | MOCATI | |
| 6362711 | PAPERWAVE | |
| 6362680 | GRANDEZ-PRODUCTS |
The U.S. Trademark Office issued the following 152 trademark registrations to persons and businesses in Indiana in January 2021 based on applications filed by Indiana trademark attorneys:
| Reg. Number | Word Mark | |
| 1 | 6257028 | SUNRISE DRUM |
| 2 | 6256982 | THE TUBE |
| 3 | 6256782 | E |
| 4 | 6256766 | SOFABSOAPS |
| 5 | 6256731 | ENPOM |
The U.S. Trademark Office issued the following 152 trademark registrations to persons and businesses in Indiana in December 2020 based on applications filed by Indiana trademark attorneys:.
| Reg. Number | Word Mark | |
| 6230565 | SALTWATER ARMS | |
| 6221997 | LINCOLN ENHANCED VALUE | |
| 6216864 | WE PICK UP PALLETS | |
| 6233215 | PREMIUM SERVICE – NO SHENANIGANS! | |
| 6233134 | YOUR CURB APPEAL IS OUR DEAL |
The U.S. Trademark Office issued the following 137 trademark registrations to persons and businesses in Indiana in November 2020 based on applications filed by Indiana trademark attorneys:.
| Registration No. | Word Mark |
| 6207829 | THERMAL TO-GO MUG |
| 6191031 | TUFF LINQ |
| 6205773 | ATLAS SPECIALIZED TRANSPORTATION |
| 6205640 | OMNISEPT |
| 6205535 | P PURIZEE |
The U.S. Trademark Office issued the following 159 trademark registrations to persons and businesses in Indiana in October 2020 based on applications filed by Indiana trademark attorneys:
| Reg. Number | Word Mark |
| 6171625 | GANT COIN |
| 6186820 | GRASTON |
| 6185288 | ACTIVE CARE |
| 6184959 | A&A SURFACES |
| 6184958 | A&A SURFACES |
Washington, D.C.– A travel-reservation website, Booking.com, filed federal trademark applications for a number of marks including the term “Booking.com.” After being examined, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) refused registration for the mark on the grounds it was a generic name for online reservation services.
However, the District Court, the Fourth Circuit, and the U.S. Supreme Court all found “Booking.com” should be granted registration even though the term “booking” on its own would be generic. The Courts reasoned that because only one entity can occupy an internet domain name at one time, consumers could associate a term styled as “generic.com” with a particular website and source of services.
While the USPTO also argued that allowing trademark protection for “Booking.com” could inhibit competitors from using the term “booking,” the Supreme Court cited multiple doctrines that guard against anticompetitive effects. Those doctrines ensure that a registration for terms such as “Booking.com” would not give the registrant a monopoly on the term “booking.” Therefore, the Supreme Court declined to rule in a manner “that would largely disallow registration of ‘generic.com’ terms and open the door to cancellation of scores of currently registered marks.”
Indiana Intellectual Property Law News