The US Trademark Office issued the following 115 trademark registrations to persons and businesses in Indiana in May, 2007, based on applications filed by Indiana Trademark Attorneys:

 Reg. Number 

Mark

Click to View
1           3,243,605 PREDATOR DX2 View
2           3,246,167 PREDATOR DX2 View
3           3,247,570 INDY PRO SERIES View
4           3,247,142 INDY DOWN FORCE View
5           3,242,515 CREDITHRIFT FINANCIAL View

Continue reading

 

The US Trademark Office issued the following 134 trademark registrations to persons and businesses in Indiana in April, 2007, based on applications filed by Indiana Trademark Attorneys:

 Reg. Number 

Mark

Click to View
1           3,233,413 FORWARD View
2           3,227,626 CLARENCEBROOKS.COM View
3           3,235,161 DISCOVER BEAUTY BEYOND THE SUN View
4           3,227,294 View
5           3,227,293 CS View

Continue reading

 

The US Trademark Office issued the following 99 trademark registrations to persons and businesses in Indiana in March, 2007, based on applications filed by Indiana Trademark Attorneys:

 Reg. Number 

Mark

Click to View
1           3,220,725 GET BRONZE! View
2           3,220,178 View
3           3,220,782 MULTI-PHASE View
4           3,219,908 THE WHALE HUNTERS View
5           3,217,517 SMART MOVE View

Continue reading

 

Indiana patent attorneys obtained issuance of the following 59 patents from the US Patent Office to persons and businesses in Indiana in March, 2007:

 

PAT. NO.

 

Title

1

PP17,525

Poplar tree named `Curly Poplar`

2

D539,229

Electrical conduit

3

7,196,248

Soybean cultivar SG5322NRR

4

7,196,191

Catalytic oxidation of C–H bonds

5

7,196,100

Opioid receptor antagonists

Continue reading

 

The US Trademark Office issued the following 115 trademark registrations to persons and businesses in Indiana in February, 2007, based on applications filed by Indiana Trademark Attorneys:

 Reg. Number 

Mark

Click to View
1           3,208,546 INDIANAPOLIS MOTOR SPEEDWAY View
2           3,206,262 SLIPPERY NOODLE INN View
3           3,210,886 VALEO View
4           3,206,768 FONO WIRELESS View
5           3,213,145 REACTIVITY View

Continue reading

 

Evansville, IN – Mice Direct, a Georgia seller for rodents, has achieved dismissal of a trademark infringement suit brought against it in Indiana by its competitor, RodentPro.com, for lack of personal jurisdiction.

Rats.jpgRats2.jpgMice Direct and RodentPro.com each sell via the Internet dead / frozen mice and rats, primarily as food, to owners of snakes, reptiles and birds of prey that prefer eating whole carasses. As a result of RodentPro’s lower prices, Mice Direct stated on its website that “We’re Real Rodent Pros!” and that it its mice and rats were “farm raised” and not cheap “laboratory surplus.” In response, RodentPro sued Mice Direct for trademark infringement, unfair competition and trade dress infringement.

Mice Direct moved to dismiss the suit for lack of jurisdiction, because it did not sell its rodents in Indiana. RodentPro responded by arguing that jurisdiction was proper per Indianapolis Colts,Inc. v. Metro. Baltimore Football Club Ltd., 34 F.3d 410 (7th Cir. 1994) because Mice Direct “directed” its trademark infringing activities at Indiana, the location of the trademark owner. RodentPro also cited Panavision Int’l L.P. v. Toeppen, 141 F.3d 1316 (9th Cir. 1998). In that case, Panavision, a California corporation, sued Toeppen, an Illinois resident, for trademark dilution. Toeppen had acquired a domain name in Panavision’s trademark, “Panavision.” Toeppen offered to “settle” the matter if Panavision paid him $13,000. After Panavision refused, Toeppen registered Panavision’s other trademark, “Panaflex,” as a domain name. Panavision later filed suit against Toeppen in California for dilution of its trademarks. The district court held that Toeppen was subject to suit in California under the “effects doctrine.”

 

The US Trademark Office issued the following 143 trademark registrations to persons and businesses in Indiana in January, 2007, based on applications filed by Indiana Trademark Attorneys:

 Reg. Number 

Mark

Click to View
1           3,202,138 INDY 500 View
2           3,193,247 VONEXUS View
3           3,198,462 SUROS View
4           3,204,070 HAL’S FABULOUS VEGAS View
5           3,196,149 ZEMAC View

Continue reading

Contact Information