Pic-1-2Energy Intelligence Group, Inc. and its UK-based counterpart have filed a lawsuit against Indianapolis, Indiana company, Calumet, Inc., claiming that Calumet repeatedly copied and distributed issues of the plaintiffs’ copyrighted publications—Oil Daily and Energy Intelligence News—without authorization. The lawsuit, brought in the U.S. District Court for Southern Indiana, accuses Calumet of willful copyright infringement, and seeks damages, injunctive relief, and attorneys’ fees.

The plaintiffs, long-time publishers in the energy sector, allege that Calumet subscribed to only one copy of their publications but shared the content with multiple employees in violation of clear copyright warnings. According to the complaint, Calumet had been a subscriber since 2004 and renewed its subscription annually for a single-copy license, which explicitly barred distribution or forwarding. Despite this, internal data from Energy Intelligence’s servers showed that, over just a few months, dozens of issues were downloaded hundreds of times on over 100 devices. This pattern, the plaintiffs argue, reveals a systematic practice of unauthorized copying and internal distribution.

The complaint outlines extensive steps taken by the publisher to warn users of copyright restrictions, including notices in emails, on their website, and within the publications themselves. It claims that Calumet ignored these warnings and refused offers to increase the number of licensed users.

The U.S. Trademark Office issued the following  191 trademark registrations to persons and businesses in Indiana in June 2025 based on applications filed by Indiana trademark attorneys:

7840585 INDIANA BEACH
7828802 FAST ACT
7841673 M.O.M. METHOD
7819850 CAPXBALL
7819849 CAPSBALL
7820674 ECOBAKE
7820675 ECOBAKE
7828467 ALTERNATIVE CONVERSATIONS
7815746

Continue reading

Pic-1-1Missouri-based company, Precision Planter Solutions, LLC, has filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court of Northern Indiana against Solid Rock AG Solutions, Inc., accusing the company of patent infringement. According to the complaint, Precision Planter owns a patent—U.S. Patent No. 12,274,187—that describes a method and apparatus aimed at extending the service life of agricultural planters by addressing wear and tear in pivoting support arms. The patented technology seeks to solve problems caused by constant motion over uneven farmland, which can lead to equipment damage and costly repairs.

Precision Planter alleges that Solid Rock is making, using, selling, and offering to sell products that unlawfully use the technology covered by this patent. The complaint specifically points to Solid Rock’s parallel arm rebuilding and exchange systems, sold and promoted through its websites, which Precision Planter says match each part of its patented design. Images and descriptions from the websites are cited to support these claims, including the use of metallic collars and bushings that fit the specifications outlined in the patent.Pic2-2

The lawsuit claims that Solid Rock’s actions violate federal patent law and that the infringement is ongoing and willful. Precision Planter argues that this has caused financial damage, loss of market share, and harm to its reputation, and that these harms will continue unless the court intervenes.

LogoIndiana Bible College has filed a lawsuit in federal court against Fred Bock Music Company, Dr. Rosephanye Powell, and up to 100 unnamed individuals or entities. The dispute centers on a piece of music titled “John 1,” which the college claims it composed independently. The defendants argue that “John 1” infringes on the copyright of Dr. Powell’s earlier musical work, “The Word Was God,” which is also based on the same passage of scripture from the Bible.  (Click on the links to hear renditions of each song.)

The conflict began when the defendants sent the college a cease-and-desist letter, asserting that “John 1” was a derivative work and constituted copyright infringement. Indiana Bible College denies these claims and insists that their composition is original and does not use any protectable elements of Dr. Powell’s work.

According to the complaint, the defendants went beyond legal demands by sharing statements online and with news outlets accusing the college of plagiarism and intellectual dishonesty. The college alleges that these statements were not only false but also harmful, damaging its reputation and disrupting relationships with students, musical collaborators, and organizations that had planned to perform or promote the piece. It also claims that the public allegations caused people to question the integrity of the composers involved and led to a loss of opportunities and trust.Logo2

Fort Wayne, IndianaBrotherhood Mutual Insurance Company has filed a lawsuit seeking a declaratory judgment against Aloft Media, LLC, George Street Partners, Todd Schmidt, and George Andrew Gordon. The case centers on a patent dispute over U.S. Patent No. 10,372,793, which Brotherhood says is being wrongly used to demand a licensing payment.

Pic2-1-300x247According to the complaint, Aloft Media claims that Brotherhood’s website infringes on this patent, which covers a method involving drop-down menus on a web page. Brotherhood argues the patent is invalid and unenforceable and claims it does not infringe on any part of it. Brotherhood also says that the technology described in the patent is not new or inventive and would not meet modern patent standards, especially following the Supreme Court’s 2016 Alice decision, which raised the bar for patenting abstract ideas implemented on computers.

Brotherhood is asking the court to declare that its website does not infringe the patent, that the patent itself is invalid, and that it cannot be enforced due to inequitable conduct—alleging that key information was intentionally withheld during the patent’s approval process. The complaint outlines what Brotherhood claims were misrepresentations or omissions in the history of the patent application, Aloft’s record of filing at least 14 patent infringement lawsuits in Texas, and a complex web of related entities that frequently file similar patent lawsuits.

Patent368Pic-1Treace Medical Concepts, Inc. has filed a lawsuit against Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. and Paragon 28, Inc., accusing the two companies of infringing on four of its patents (Patent No. 12,102,368; Patent No. 12,268,397; Patent No. 12,268,428; Patent No. 12,274,481) related to the Lapiplasty® system. This system is used in bunion correction surgery and was designed to improve upon older surgical methods that Treace says were less effective.

In the complaint, Treace alleges that the defendants are selling products that are too similar to the patented features of the Lapiplasty® system, including both the surgical tools and the techniques used during the procedure. Treace emphasizes that its system is unique in how it corrects bunions in three dimensions and guides the surgeon through each step to produce more consistent results for patients.

The timing of the lawsuit is notable, coming shortly after Zimmer Biomet finalized its acquisition of Paragon 28 in April 2025 for approximately $1.2 billion. As a result of the deal, Treace may now be challenging a broader range of products that include Paragon’s technologies, which could overlap with Treace’s intellectual property.

Pic2An Indiana-based company, TK&C’S, LLC, which operates under the name Dog ‘N Suds, has filed a lawsuit in federal court against a Michigan business, Airline Dog ‘N Suds, Inc., and its president, David J. Hosticka. The complaint centers around trademark infringement, unfair competition, and breach of contract.

Dog ‘N Suds alleges that it owns the exclusive rights to several trademarks associated with its brand, including names, logos, and recipes that date back to the 1950s and have been formally registered for decades. According to the lawsuit, Dog ‘N Suds entered into a licensing agreement with Airline Dog ‘N Suds in 2007, giving them permission to use these trademarks and recipes in a defined region of Michigan. That agreement expired in 2017 and was not renewed.Pic-1-300x225

Despite the expiration of the license, Dog ‘N Suds claims that the Michigan business continued to use its name, branding, and products without authorization. The lawsuit includes allegations that Airline Dog ‘N Suds has continued selling food and root beer under the Dog ‘N Suds branding, which the Indiana company views as a violation of trademark law and a breach of the original licensing agreement. Dog ‘N Suds further claims that attempts to stop the use—including cease-and-desist letters sent in April 2025—were ignored or refused.

Photographer Morgan Howarth has filed a federal lawsuit in Indiana against Angie’s List Inc., doing business as Angi, alleging copyright infringement. The complaint accuses Angi of copying and distributing one of Howarth’s registered photographs without permission to promote its home services business online. The case centers on a single copyrighted image titled “1881_Nash_Glickman_Bath_Shower_2_f.jpg,” created in 2015 and registered in early 2016.

PicHowarth, a Washington, D.C.-based photographer with over 25 years of experience, claims the image was used without a license on Angi’s Home Advisor website. According to the suit, he discovered the unauthorized use in June 2024 and attempted to resolve the issue with Angi later that year, but those efforts were unsuccessful.

The complaint, however, contains several noticeable errors, suggesting it may have been compiled using a copy-and-paste approach—likely due to the high volume of similar lawsuits Howarth has filed. Over the past 21 years, he has initiated 133 federal cases, nearly all involving copyright infringement. This places him among a small group of photographers who regularly go to court to protect their creative work.

The U.S. Trademark Office issued the following  217 trademark registrations to persons and businesses in Indiana in May 2025 based on applications filed by Indiana trademark attorneys:

RegistrationNumber Wordmark
7804387 BETTER BEHAVIOR IS JUST A CLICK AWAY
7790432 FNEX
7792386
7795281 FLOYDS DELUXE
7783338

Continue reading

logoCrown Point, IN – Plaintiff Cloudbusters, Inc., a technology company based in Indiana, has filed a lawsuit against multiple parties including a former employee and two Florida-based businesses. The company is alleging theft of trade secrets, breach of contract, and other related claims.

According to the complaint, Cloudbusters accuses its former IT manager, Ryan Tinsley, and the companies Practice42, LLC and The Law Office of Audrey Ehrhardt, PLLC, of orchestrating a plan to take confidential business information for their own benefit.

Cloudbusters states that it had hired Tinsley in 2023 and promoted him to IT Manager, a role in which he had access to sensitive company data, including cybersecurity systems, customer lists, and proprietary tools. The company says Tinsley signed both non-compete and non-disclosure agreements during his employment.

Contact Information