Articles Posted in Patent Infringement

Fort Wayne, Indiana – Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company has filed a lawsuit seeking a declaratory judgment against Aloft Media, LLC, George Street Partners, Todd Schmidt, and George Andrew Gordon. The case centers on a patent dispute over U.S. Patent No. 10,372,793, which Brotherhood says is being wrongly used to demand a licensing payment.

According to the complaint, Aloft Media claims that Brotherhood’s website infringes on this patent, which covers a method involving drop-down menus on a web page. Brotherhood argues the patent is invalid and unenforceable and claims it does not infringe on any part of it. Brotherhood also says that the technology described in the patent is not new or inventive and would not meet modern patent standards, especially following the Supreme Court’s 2016 Alice decision, which raised the bar for patenting abstract ideas implemented on computers.

Brotherhood is asking the court to declare that its website does not infringe the patent, that the patent itself is invalid, and that it cannot be enforced due to inequitable conduct—alleging that key information was intentionally withheld during the patent’s approval process. The complaint outlines what Brotherhood claims were misrepresentations or omissions in the history of the patent application, Aloft’s record of filing at least 14 patent infringement lawsuits in Texas, and a complex web of related entities that frequently file similar patent lawsuits.

Elkhart, Indiana – MORryde International, Inc. has filed a lawsuit against Airxcel, Inc., doing business as Suburban, claiming patent infringement. The case centers around three patents (US Patent Nos. 9,903,121, 10,519,671, and 11,739,534), allegedly owned by MORryde, that relate to folding staircases for vehicles like RVs and trailers. These patents—supposedly issued in 2018, 2019, and 2023—cover features such as spring-assisted folding and adjustable legs designed to improve safety and ease of use when entering and exiting a vehicle.

MORryde;s ‘671 Patent

MORryde contends that Suburban’s products, specifically the Stow Away Steps and the Lift Assist Step, unlawfully use the technology protected under MORryde’s patents. According to the complaint, these Suburban products are designed in a way that mimics MORryde’s patented features, including folding mechanisms and mounting systems similar to those described in the patent documents. MORryde claims it first raised conc

Fortress Iron L.P. filed a lawsuit against Digger Specialties, Inc. for patent infringement, alleging that Digger’s Westbury VertiCable Aluminum Railing violates Fortress’s U.S. Patents 11,643,838 (the “‘838 Patent”) and 12,180,735 (the “‘735 Patent”). The complaint states that Fortress, a Texas-based company, is the owner of the patents protecting its FortressCable V-Series steel cable railing systemv. Meanwhile, the court documents assert that Digger, based in Indiana, produces a similar product and has reportedly continued to sell it despite being notified of the alleged infringement.

The lawsuit claims that Digger’s product infringes on the patents, particularly regarding features such as the design of vertical cable barriers and adjustable end members for tension control. Fortress seeks monetary damages, treble damages for willful infringement, and an injunction to stop Digger from continuing to sell the infringing product.

The case has been assigned to Judge Damon R. Leichty and Magistrate Judge Scott J. Frankel in the U.S. District Court of Northern Indiana Case No. 3:25-cv-00099.

Uriah Products, LLC has filed a lawsuit against CURT Manufacturing LLC for patent infringement. Uriah, a Missouri-based company that has been making and selling trailer parts since 2004, claims CURT is violating its rights under U.S. Patent No. 10,857,846. This patent, issued in December 2020, protects an adjustable hitch assembly used in towing equipment, such as Uriah’s popular Aluma-Tow Hitch Ball Mount.

According to Uriah, CURT is selling similar products under its Alumalite Adjustable Aluminum Hitch line, which include models with varying drop sizes. Uriah argues these products infringe on key features of the ‘846 patent. It also states that CURT’s products are almost identical to its own, apart from size differences and the distances between the top of the hitch and ball mount of the hitch.

In the lawsuit, Uriah is asking the court to declare that CURT has infringed on the patent, to stop CURT from selling the infringing products, and to award damages for the harm caused. Uriah also wants the court to order CURT to pay its legal fees and any additional relief the court finds appropriate.

Magpul Sues Elite Tactical Systems over Alleged Patent Infringement Over Polymer Ammo Magazines

Magpul Industries Corporation has filed a patent infringement lawsuit against fellow firearm accessories manufacturer Elite Tactical Systems Group, LLC. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant has infringed upon U.S. Patents Nos. 8,991,086 and 9,746,264. Magpul claims that the defendant made, used, sold, imported, and offered polymer ammunition magazines that infringe on these patents for sale. Specifically, the defendant’s products, including the ETS 30rd 5.56x45mm NATO/.223 Remington polymer magazines, are said to incorporate the patented magazine architecture described in the ’086 and ’264 patents.

Magpul argues that the defendant’s actions are unlawful and are causing harm to its exclusive patent rights. The lawsuit seeks damages, including potential treble damages, a permanent injunction to prevent further infringement, the destruction of infringing products, attorney’s fees, and other legal remedies.